Content review process

Last reviewed: 2026-06-07

Content reviewed by qualified healthcare professionals experienced in men's sexual health and urologic care.

Step 1 — Drafting. Educational pages are drafted using guideline-aware language and avoid promotional claims.

Step 2 — Clinical review. At least one clinician familiar with the topic reviews each new or substantially updated page prior to publication.

Step 3 — Source verification. Where possible, claims reference peer-reviewed literature, society guidelines (AUA, EAU, ISSM), or recognized institutional sources.

Step 4 — Last-reviewed date. Each cornerstone educational page displays a Last Reviewed date and reviewer attribution.

Corrections. Readers can request corrections by contacting the coordinator listed in the footer.

Editorial integrity

Medical review board

Clinical content on this site is reviewed by qualified healthcare professionals with experience in men's sexual health, urology, endocrinology, and cardiometabolic medicine.

Reviewer

Board-Certified Urologist (name on file)

MD · Urology · Men's Sexual Health

Clinical review — erectile dysfunction, penile prosthesis, hormonal evaluation

Reviewer

Board-Certified Andrologist (name on file)

MD · Andrology · Reconstructive Urology

Clinical review — Peyronie's disease, reconstructive options, augmentation procedures

Reviewer

Internal Medicine / Endocrinology (name on file)

MD · Endocrinology · Cardiometabolic Health

Clinical review — testosterone, diabetes, cardiovascular contributors

Editorial standards. Content is educational, evidence-aware, and avoids promotional language, performance claims, or guarantees.

Content review process. New and updated pages are reviewed by at least one clinician familiar with the topic prior to publication.

Source verification policy. Where possible, claims reference peer-reviewed literature, guideline bodies (AUA, EAU, ISSM), or recognized institutional sources.

Last reviewed. 2026-06-07